 |
IDS ::: Prosthetics ::: Upper Limb Power
Power source mechanisms
An upper limb prosthesis can be mainly functional, mainly cosmetic or a combination of both. If functional, the power to operate it will probably be from one or more of the following sources:
Body Powered
|
A transtibial exoskeletal prosthesis with body powered voluntary closing spilt hook. |
|
A simple shoulder harness and operating cord mechanism. |
|
Split hooks are normally body powered here are examples of adults. |
|
Examples of children's split hooks with soft covers for safety. |
Overview of possible body powered functions
- Grasp – by opening the prosthetic hand or terminal device. Closing is normally powered by a spring, but this is sometimes the reverse.
- Elbow flexion – extension is normally achieved by gravity.
- Locking/unlocking of the elbow.
- Note! All of the above are controlled and powered by biscapular abduction – Not easy!
Myoelectric
Electrodes incorporated into the prosthetic sockets pick up micro signals on the skins surface. These signals are amplified by battery power. The amplified current drives a motor via a clutch.
Possible myoelectric functions.
- Grasp – by opening and closing the prosthetic hand or terminal device.
- In some cases the speed or power can be proportional to the strength of signal.
- Rotation of the hand or terminal device – this mimics pronation/suspiration.
- Elbow flexion./extension
Myoelectric considerations
- The components are expensive.
- They require space to be incorporated.
- They can be heavy, especially when more than one function is included e.g. grasp and rotation.
- Not all patients can generate the required signals or control them adequately.
- These prostheses are not suitable for frequent heavy use.
- Two electrode sites are not always essential.
|
Inserting the rechargeable battery for the Myoelectric prosthesis. |
|
A Myoelectric transradial prosthesis cut away to show construction. |
|
Sensor hand - the internal mechanism of the sensor myoletic hand.
Transparent transcarpal hand. |
|
A Myoelectric hand and greiffer terminal device, showing internal components which power the hand or Greiffer. |
|
A young man using a Greiffer hand.
A greiffer hand is an alternative to the normal myoletic hand. Its design permits much more precise grip for technical tasks and also permits better visual feedback. |
|
Examples of hands and internal mechanisms |
|
Examples of hands and internal mechanisms |
Myoelectric considerations
- The components are expensive.
- They require space to be incorporated.
- They can be heavy, especially when more than one function is included e.g. grasp and rotation.
- Not all patients can generate the required signals or control them adequately.
- These prostheses are not suitable for frequent heavy use.
- Two electrode sites are not always essential.
|
A relatively high degree of dexterity can be achieved with both body powered and myolectric hands. |
|
A body powered hand and cover. |
|
A close up of a Greiffer hand. |
|
 |